![]() ![]() policy, that devalues multifaceted analysis for a relentless demonization of Putin, with little regard for facts. Since the early 2000s, the media have followed a different leader-centric narrative, also consistent with U.S. journalists still give the impression that Yeltsin was an ideal Russian leader. This included his economic "shock therapy" and oligarchic looting of essential state assets, which destroyed tens of millions of Russian lives armed destruction of a popularly elected parliament and imposition of a "presidential" constitution, which dealt a crippling blow to democratization and now empowers Putin brutal war in tiny Chechnya, which gave rise to terrorists in Russia's North Caucasus rigging of his own re-election in 1996 and leaving behind, in 1999, his approval ratings in single digits, a disintegrating country laden with weapons of mass destruction. media adopted Washington's narrative that almost everything President Boris Yeltsin did was a "transition from communism to democracy" and thus in the U.S.' best interests. It began in the early 1990s, following the end of the Soviet Union, when the U.S. The history of this degradation is also clear. media on Russia today are less objective, less balanced, more conformist and scarcely less ideological than when they covered Soviet Russia during the Cold War. Even in the venerable New York Times and Washington Post, news reports, editorials and commentaries no longer adhere rigorously to traditional journalistic standards, often failing to provide essential facts and context to make a clear distinction between reporting and analysis to require at least two different political or "expert" views on major developments or to publish opposing opinions on their op-ed pages. There are notable exceptions, but a general pattern has developed. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines - particularly about the Sochi Olympics, Ukraine and, unfailingly, President Vladimir Putin - is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm. national security, has been underway for many years. press coverage of Russia, a country still vital to U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |